Audio
K Shantel: 'Eternals'
ReFramed by
Attitude Foundation3 seasons
Episode 7
28 mins
This week, transformative justice influencer K Shantel joins the team to discuss Marvel movie Eternals.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e8f1/0e8f198acc4f0a30e4bd58031d14b9b5482425a0" alt="A row of eight costumed superheroes from the Eternals movie stand on a beach looking directly into the camera."
This week, we have the incredible K Shantel join us to discuss one of Marvel's newest films, Eternals.
Eternals follows an ancient group of superheroes, who are tasked with destroying their evil counterparts - The Deviants. As always, there's a few twists and turns - and the film seemingly sets up a new set of films in the MCU. We discuss Eternals because one of the main superheroes - Makkari - is Deaf and is played by Deaf actress, Lauren Ridloff.
Follow along with this episode to find out what Jason, Steph & K Shantel thought of the disability representation in Eternals.
0:00
coming up on reframed and it wasn't
0:03
because of
0:04
an accident it wasn't because of some
0:07
terrible thing that happened to her and
0:09
that's the other thing too i think is
0:10
like representing the diverse range of
0:14
what disability is that's everyone's
0:16
favorite because it's such a hot topic
0:25
welcome back everyone to reframed
0:28
disability and media the podcast that
0:30
reframes how disability is portrayed in
0:32
film and tv
0:33
i'm your host jason climo and today i
0:35
have my lovely co-host stephanie dao
0:38
with me
0:39
along with this this week's special
0:41
guest which is k chantal all the way
0:43
from the us which is very exciting
0:46
and today we'll be discussing eternals
0:48
the marvel film that has come out in
0:51
cinemas very recently
0:53
in australia
0:54
so recently in fact that when i told
0:57
steph we were doing eternals this week
0:59
she was like i actually need to run off
1:01
to the movies to go see that i thought
1:03
it might be on the internet somewhere
1:06
a little behind the game but it's fine i
1:08
made it
1:08
i love it i love that we're just
1:10
running on the fly here um but before we
1:13
get into discussing eternals let's say
1:16
hello to k chantal and learn a bit more
1:18
about them so welcome to the podcast
1:22
we're very excited to have you on
1:25
yeah thank you so much for having me um
1:28
as you mentioned i am k chantal
1:30
i am located in birmingham alabama in
1:33
the u.s
1:34
um i am a disability advocate an
1:37
entrepreneur a model and i also do some
1:41
freelance writing from time to time i am
1:43
just
1:44
so delighted to be here and to talk with
1:46
you guys today
1:47
yeah i maybe did a little bit of our
1:49
instagram talking before we chatted
1:50
today oh no
1:53
and i'm i'm so excited like
1:56
yeah i love all of your photos like
1:58
amazing but i mean one thing i'm very
2:00
excited to ask you about is you recently
2:02
did a campaign for sephora is that
2:04
correct
2:05
yes that is correct i'm even wearing my
2:08
sephora lost today so you know
2:11
just did it
2:13
yes i did um i did a campaign with
2:16
sephora
2:17
with um one of my best wheel friends her
2:20
name is amy morgan and they reached out
2:22
to us they wanted to do a story
2:24
about
2:25
um we belong to something beautiful
2:28
and they wanted to use a different
2:29
demographic than they used in the past
2:31
and
2:32
they loved our chemistry they loved our
2:35
story and i was just really happy to be
2:37
part of that campaign
2:39
and they
2:41
they represented us so eloquently and so
2:44
beautifully like that you don't
2:46
get to see too often for people with
2:48
disabilities and i think that was my
2:50
favorite part about working with sephora
2:52
so heads up to them for that absolutely
2:55
i think what i loved about seeing what
2:57
you guys did with it they really
2:59
um i guess championed your voice like
3:02
they weren't speaking for you they
3:03
weren't speaking about you it was you
3:05
guys speaking about yourself which i
3:06
thought was i loved it it was great
3:09
exactly and i think this one's like
3:12
and for those who haven't seen it
3:13
there's one part that i particularly
3:15
love but i'll let you
3:17
jump into it
3:19
there's the part about um disability and
3:21
sexuality
3:25
that's everyone's favorite because it's
3:27
such a hot topic um you know people get
3:30
rude about the questions that they ask
3:33
regarding our sexuality and it's and
3:35
it's it doesn't have to be that
3:37
complicated
3:38
we are human
3:40
you know we are human we
3:43
we speak shocker
3:45
we experience um sexual relationships
3:48
like everyone else
3:50
i love that and it's like i guess from
3:52
your perspective you know you have
3:54
all of these different roles that you're
3:56
playing at the moment in a lot of it
3:58
seems to be tied into disability
3:59
advocacy as well
4:01
what are some of the main things that
4:02
you think need to change in all of these
4:05
creative industries like fashion film
4:06
and tv
4:08
i think that there needs to be more
4:09
positive
4:10
representation for people with
4:11
disabilities and not just um
4:14
where they like to portray us as someone
4:17
who needs help or somebody who needs to
4:19
be saved
4:20
like all of those stories they're played
4:22
out they need to see
4:24
our love glories they need to see our
4:26
glamorous sides they need to see us as
4:30
humans and stop dehumanizing our life
4:32
experiences
4:33
yeah i couldn't agree more it's
4:35
basically like i sort of think of it as
4:37
like disability needs rebranding like
4:39
for too long it's been branded as sad
4:42
negative pitying you know we need to
4:44
take back that word the disability word
4:46
and rebrand it to be positive empowering
4:49
and and beautiful and and sexual
4:53
exactly all of the things all of you all
4:56
of the human things literally yeah
5:00
like the same respect that you give to
5:03
um
5:05
other
5:06
i would say some some other you know
5:08
disabilities get get to be shown in a
5:10
positive light um let's do the same for
5:13
wheelchair use
5:14
and that's the other thing too i think
5:16
is like representing the diverse range
5:19
of what disability is because it isn't
5:21
just one experience clearly so and also
5:25
like trying to make sure that you're
5:26
intersectional within that as well
5:29
and making sure everything is as genuine
5:31
as possible and like my whole thing that
5:33
i always bang on about is that like
5:35
we need to get people with disability
5:37
on screen but also behind the camera to
5:39
control the narrative because that's the
5:41
only way we're really going to get
5:43
that real genuine representation um
5:47
and i love like did you know obviously
5:49
tell us if you can't tell us but it
5:51
seems like sephora gave you a lot of
5:53
control over the narrative that was
5:54
shared in this campaign as well
5:57
yes they did they um they pretty much
6:00
let us run the story they sent us some
6:02
questions and they let us edit them how
6:04
we saw fit
6:05
um they let us elaborate however we
6:07
wanted and they asked like
6:10
how things should be worded like they
6:12
they got it right
6:14
they got it right it's so good
6:17
that's so good and it's and all it takes
6:19
is that simple asking questions right in
6:21
a respectful way like it doesn't it's
6:24
not hard it's not hard for people to do
6:26
it right
6:27
literally
6:28
they don't include it in the
6:29
conversation for these things to go
6:31
right
6:32
and that's what i have to do is
6:34
literally like i feel like there's so
6:35
many opportunities out there
6:37
um like i know in australia because i do
6:39
some fashion modeling stuff as well um
6:43
a lot of the brands and kind of event
6:45
organizers are just
6:46
so shy about asking because they feel
6:49
like they're going to do something wrong
6:51
which like number one is like just do a
6:52
bit of research like there's so many of
6:54
us out there on instagram on wherever we
6:57
are tick tock wherever educating people
7:00
so like one it's like just do a bit of
7:01
research
7:02
but two it's like if you're coming to us
7:04
with like
7:05
a genuine opportunity to create some
7:07
change and give us a you know a platform
7:09
to amplify our own voices
7:12
if you get something slightly wrong or
7:14
say something like in the wrong language
7:16
or slightly offensive we're not going to
7:18
shut you down and not want to do the
7:20
opportunity with you we're going to
7:21
probably just educate you a bit and then
7:22
also be really grateful for that
7:24
opportunity so i think all the time
7:26
people get stuck because they're like
7:27
scared that they're going to offend
7:29
someone when actually it's like
7:31
don't
7:32
get stuck in that because you you're
7:33
slowing change by doing that it's like
7:36
just ask the question so for anyone
7:38
who's following along at home where can
7:41
they follow you
7:43
on instagram facebook what are you doing
7:46
yes um i can be found on instagram
7:49
at k period chantel
7:53
official
7:55
and chantelle is spelled s-h-a-n-t
7:59
and i can be found on facebook
8:01
as carnesian chantal
8:03
and i know carnesian may be hard for
8:06
some
8:07
some people to spell so i'm gonna spell
8:09
it
8:10
it's k-a-r
8:14
that's carnesian chantel on facebook
8:16
well hopefully get a little influx of
8:18
followers um and i know that i you know
8:21
from having a bit of a stalk of your
8:23
instagram and loving what you're posting
8:25
and if i have learned some stuff so
8:27
i'm very excited and now i'm excited i
8:30
think it's time to jump straight into
8:32
reviewing
8:33
eternals um the marvel film um steph did
8:37
you want to give us a bit of an overview
8:39
of
8:40
eternals sure yeah so eternals
8:44
is the latest offering a feature film
8:46
from marvel and it tells the story of
8:49
this group of immortal beings called the
8:52
eternals
8:53
and each of them have superhuman powers
8:56
and they have been given a mission
8:59
about seven thousand years ago to come
9:01
to earth and protect the humans from the
9:03
evil deviants
9:06
it's directed by nomad land director uh
9:09
chloe zao so this is her first foray
9:12
into the marvel cinematic universe uh
9:15
but the reason that we're talking about
9:16
it on reframe today
9:18
is the character makari who is played by
9:22
actress lauren ridloff and makari is the
9:25
first deaf superhero in the marvel
9:28
cinematic universe or possibly
9:31
ever on screen i would venture to say
9:33
but uh yeah that's that's what brought
9:36
us to talking about it today
9:38
so cool thanks for that overview stuff
9:40
that was amazing
9:42
um okay chantelle what did you think
9:44
about the representation of makari's
9:47
character
9:48
yes um i loved
9:51
right off the bat like soon as the movie
9:53
started i love the representation
9:55
because they started off with
9:58
the sign language and then
10:01
having the person that she was talking
10:03
to respond to her in sign language like
10:06
right when the movie starts it sets up
10:07
the scene to know that okay we're
10:09
dealing with a person who has a
10:10
disability and this is going to be
10:11
awesome so it's like i got excited from
10:14
that moment
10:15
because i i had heard that there was
10:18
someone with a disability but i didn't
10:19
really read
10:21
on the movie before i went and saw it so
10:23
i
10:24
not knowing and going there i was
10:26
excited
10:27
yeah i think that's what i really
10:29
responded to was it you know it wasn't
10:32
just her speaking in asl american sign
10:35
language it was
10:36
you know the characters responding to
10:38
her in that as well so it wasn't seen as
10:40
this like oh this is an odd thing that
10:42
she does it's just how she communicates
10:46
and how they communicate with her so it
10:48
wasn't and it wasn't because of
10:50
an accident it wasn't because of some
10:53
terrible thing that happened to her it's
10:55
just part of her character um so i and
10:59
it wasn't highlighted too heavily and as
11:01
you said it was just organically weaved
11:03
into the story and
11:04
that's what i really loved about and of
11:07
course played by
11:09
deaf actress herself you know authentic
11:11
representation yeah yes yes
11:13
[Music]
11:15
yeah i'm glad you pointed that out
11:16
because they didn't make her disability
11:18
her tragedy
11:19
yeah there was like no um real
11:22
explanation like it was just
11:24
that kind of incidental
11:26
um
11:27
inclusion and of a character with
11:30
disability who also happen to have like
11:32
an amazing superpower um and i obviously
11:35
also i also bang on all of the time
11:37
about disabled characters being
11:39
portrayed by or played by sorry um
11:42
people disability and
11:44
i love that they actually did that this
11:46
time around um
11:49
i don't know if there was really
11:50
anything quite negative that i thought
11:52
about it i feel like i saw somewhere
11:54
that there was possibly something to do
11:56
with her superpower
11:58
that like helped her hear things around
12:00
her and i didn't know if that was a
12:01
little bit playing into the whole
12:03
overcoming disability um but maybe i
12:06
need to check on that a bit more
12:08
i didn't pick up on that in the film
12:10
itself yeah what what i find really
12:13
interesting is
12:15
i i read some articles about it and the
12:18
character of makari in the comic books
12:20
that it's based on
12:22
was not in any way connected to the
12:24
macaroni character we see in the film so
12:27
originally it was
12:29
a huge apparently white dude who was of
12:32
hearing um so i'd really love to know
12:36
what the process was of
12:38
turning the makara character into what
12:41
we saw on the screen which i mean all
12:43
for it but yeah i'd love to know that
12:45
process of what happened with that yeah
12:48
yeah it's like to be a fly on the wall
12:49
sometimes in those conversations to be
12:51
like i wonder how they came up with that
12:53
concept and i love that they did
12:56
well i think that's it it's one of those
12:58
things that just because something was
13:00
one way
13:01
it doesn't mean that you can't take that
13:02
opportunity to change it up and make it
13:05
more appealing to
13:07
a progressive modern audience you know
13:09
that's
13:10
um yeah interesting very interesting and
13:13
that's the thing right like that's the
13:14
power of inclusion is like the whole
13:16
power that these creative people have is
13:19
to like take those old stories that are
13:21
like
13:22
fan favorites and then actually make
13:24
them more modern realistic and have
13:27
people of all different i guess like
13:29
walks of life if you want to say
13:31
in there and make it truly inclusive so
13:33
and you're also opening it up to a new
13:36
audience because let's face it i maybe
13:38
wouldn't have gone and seen
13:40
eternals if i didn't know that there was
13:42
a deaf superhero in there so you know
13:45
you're getting you're getting new people
13:46
into the cinemas
13:48
yeah and that's like the business case i
13:50
guess around inclusion isn't it is that
13:52
like
13:53
you know if you are including these
13:54
different communities you're going to
13:56
have a better opportunity of actually
13:58
like tapping into those different
13:59
markets and making money out of it so
14:02
you know giving that little plug there
14:05
it's making it like it's not just like
14:06
some charitable case that we're talking
14:08
about here of like include us we want to
14:10
feel loved like there's actually a lot
14:12
of money to be made out of including
14:14
everyone but you know talking today
14:16
specifically about disability inclusion
14:18
there's billions of dollars out there to
14:20
be made
14:21
in terms of fashion tv film whatever it
14:23
is
14:24
um by actually including us so
14:26
yeah i think the other thing that's
14:28
worth mentioning was um
14:31
it was kind of alluded to but it didn't
14:33
really go into any depth but she seemed
14:35
to have
14:37
a
14:38
romantic potential connection
14:41
with i can't remember his name
14:43
but one of the other eternals uh the guy
14:46
who could control minds um yeah so i
14:49
would have loved i think my only bug
14:51
bear with um her character was we didn't
14:54
see enough of her she was kind of
14:56
missing throughout the middle portion of
14:58
the film and i would have loved to have
15:00
seen a lot more of her
15:02
um being utilized throughout the whole
15:03
film
15:05
yeah i think it'll be really interesting
15:06
to see like in future
15:09
um eternal films as well because i'm
15:10
pretty sure that this is becoming like
15:12
the new avengers type thing there'll be
15:14
multiple movies with the eternals
15:15
characters
15:16
um
15:17
if they explore a bit more of that
15:20
like romantic and possibly like sexual
15:23
or intimate connection
15:24
between those two characters um because
15:27
i think that would be really powerful as
15:29
well like you know obviously it's
15:30
powerful having a disabled superhero
15:32
like amazing but a disabled superhero
15:34
that also has like an intimate
15:36
relationship i'm just like this is
15:38
amazing ticking all the boxes for me
15:41
and the facts like i mean i think i want
15:45
probably kay chantal to speak on this
15:47
but i think as well like the fact that
15:49
it was like intersectional um
15:51
representation like they didn't go with
15:53
the most palatable version of a disabled
15:55
person possible i don't know if
15:57
you felt that was something important to
15:59
highlight
16:01
yeah absolutely um
16:03
not only did they
16:05
choose to be inclusive by you know going
16:07
with a person with a disability but they
16:10
also chose a person of color and i think
16:11
that speaks volumes
16:13
you know we don't we don't get lots of
16:15
opportunities and for years there were
16:17
what two
16:18
maybe three
16:20
hard of hearing people who were
16:21
actresses and we all knew their names
16:24
because they they recycled the ones all
16:26
the time
16:27
so you know um
16:29
it's great for us to experience new
16:31
people in this new era of
16:35
diversity and inclusion
16:36
that's it yeah it was um i'm really
16:39
excited to go and see
16:40
i have not been exposed to lauren
16:42
ridloff the actress before so um but i
16:45
really responded to her on screen i'd
16:47
love to go see what else she's done i
16:48
think she was also in the walking dead
16:51
am i getting that yeah
16:54
yeah and that's the whole thing i think
16:56
as well is that like we're not asking
16:58
for inclusion
16:59
for the sake of it either there's very
17:01
very talented disabled people out there
17:03
that you know
17:04
can be singers can be actors like
17:07
whatever can be models
17:09
and we're out here like wanting those
17:10
opportunities and that's sort of the
17:12
whole change that we're trying to create
17:13
with all of this i guess so
17:15
but yeah i think probably like you know
17:17
playing devil's advocate here the only
17:18
thing that we now need to see and the
17:20
only thing that i would say it doesn't
17:22
make my score a five out of five or
17:24
anything
17:25
is the fact that like it's the first
17:27
time they've bloody done it
17:29
uh we need more and also we probably
17:32
need um some like visibly disabled
17:34
people as well so like i am waiting for
17:38
you know our next charles xavier but
17:41
also to be portrayed by someone who's
17:43
actually disabled please um
17:45
you know i'm waiting for that vis you
17:47
know visible disability to be on screen
17:49
as well because that's probably the
17:50
stuff that really
17:52
i think will help move mountains you
17:54
know in terms of inclusion
17:56
throughout
17:58
film and tv as well but yeah i i guess
18:01
there was one other part to the new
18:03
channels that i
18:05
um
18:07
i'm not sure if i was like um
18:09
interpreting it correctly but angelina
18:11
jolie's character
18:13
um she had some sort of
18:16
uh for just or what would you say
18:18
condition
18:19
where she would
18:20
you know her behavior would change and
18:23
she in a way had to be
18:24
looked after by one of the other
18:26
characters and i don't know if they were
18:28
trying to touch on
18:30
something there as well like
18:31
neurodiverse or something like that but
18:34
and if that was the case it maybe wasn't
18:36
done as well
18:38
it was a bit more reflective she has to
18:40
be taken care of just to be managed that
18:42
kind of thing so i didn't you know but
18:45
again i'm not really sure if i'm reading
18:46
too much into that character but i kind
18:49
of picked up on those vibes that they
18:51
were putting onto that character so did
18:53
anyone else feel that or
18:55
no you're right um
18:57
it's kind of hard to say it like you
18:59
said but
19:01
i i do think that's what they were
19:03
trying to do but
19:05
i feel like her moment of triumph came
19:08
when
19:09
her quote unquote caretaker
19:12
was killed
19:13
and showed that she could take care of
19:15
herself
19:16
that she could manage herself
19:19
yeah like
19:20
you know no i guess if you're watching
19:23
this hopefully you've already watched
19:24
the movie so like if we swallow her
19:26
alert
19:28
talk spoilers yeah literally like
19:30
spoiler like you know she does sort of
19:32
like i guess overcome that and i don't
19:34
know
19:36
i don't maybe not overcome like manage
19:38
by herself i think in the end and i
19:39
think that is probably an empower
19:42
empowering story as well as like an
19:43
important one and i agree stuff i wasn't
19:46
sure if it was like heading down like
19:47
neurodiverse or mental illness kind of
19:50
pathway and i would actually be really
19:51
interested
19:52
now that we've had this discussion maybe
19:54
to go and do a bit more research around
19:55
that to see
19:57
you know if anyone else has like written
19:58
anything about this because
20:01
yeah it's quite like it was a bit of
20:03
like a really nuanced um moment and
20:06
sometimes i think they throw things in
20:07
there
20:09
like that into films without actually
20:10
really thinking through like oh this
20:12
actually is representation of mental
20:14
illness and the way that we've done this
20:16
isn't great or
20:18
yeah it was really interesting
20:21
i think that's the thing like when it
20:23
comes to
20:24
like physical or sensory disabilities
20:26
it's kind of
20:28
they're a lot more obvious to audiences
20:30
but
20:31
i find filmmakers are a little um
20:34
apprehensive with putting in or putting
20:37
in labels of like being neurodiverse or
20:39
mental health and things like that just
20:41
because it's such a big
20:44
topic it's such a big
20:46
um
20:47
yeah there's a lot of things that could
20:48
go wrong with putting that on screen in
20:50
terms of representation and they need a
20:52
lot more work around that kind of thing
20:54
so i feel like there's a lot more subtle
20:56
inclusion of that kind of stuff but it's
20:58
never really
21:00
highlighted it's never really like this
21:01
is what we intended to do unless you
21:03
have something like the good doctor who
21:06
is apparently autistic or something like
21:07
that so
21:09
yes and and i struggle with that because
21:11
i love that show so much but i just wish
21:13
he was a uh an authentic person with
21:16
autism
21:17
audiences are really smart nowadays and
21:19
we really pick up on
21:21
when that authenticity is not there and
21:24
i think for me like i you know i am a
21:27
filmmaker and i know the challenges of
21:30
you know working on a film set and that
21:32
kind of thing so
21:33
you know when it comes to sort of
21:35
characters who maybe
21:36
you know need different um adaptations
21:39
and they're on on set
21:41
you know it's not like we're saying they
21:43
have to have the exact disability that
21:45
you're portraying on screen for me
21:48
i would at least just like some level of
21:51
first-hand experience some level of
21:54
authenticity that they can bring
21:56
because
21:57
you you pick up on that you you know
21:59
audiences are very
22:02
tuned in nowadays and also like if it is
22:04
incidental representation it doesn't
22:06
actually have to be like perfectly
22:08
matched like last week we spoke about
22:11
sex education
22:12
and the fact that they don't actually
22:14
like divulge any like diagnosis or
22:16
anything
22:17
of isaac's character and so then you
22:19
don't actually have to find someone who
22:21
has the exact same
22:23
you know experience or condition or
22:25
whatever you want to call it um you just
22:27
have to have someone who actually has
22:28
the experience that you're trying to
22:30
represent
22:31
in the show which is the more important
22:32
part anyway so
22:34
uh for me it's like
22:36
a foundation to build on to build a
22:39
character on you know yeah just some
22:41
understanding of what that experience is
22:44
like for for people so yeah um yeah you
22:47
know we're not saying
22:48
you know
22:49
as you said before jason things don't
22:51
have to be perfect but
22:52
you know just ask questions give things
22:55
a go
22:56
let audiences
22:57
you know evolve
22:59
yeah like obviously there's going to be
23:02
things that are done well and things
23:03
that are not done so well but like the
23:05
whole point is is that like being
23:06
receptive to the change that's happening
23:09
in the industries like i feel like just
23:11
don't block
23:12
all of this change
23:14
um you know like there were probably
23:15
things that weren't really done all that
23:17
well through like filming of eternals
23:19
and i don't we don't know all of those
23:20
details either but
23:22
you know hopefully the people that
23:24
worked on set then learn from those
23:26
experiences so that next time it's even
23:28
better and i think that's the point is
23:29
like we're not asking for perfection no
23:32
one's really asking for perfection right
23:34
now from any industry and we might not
23:36
ever get perfection but
23:38
we're just asking for
23:39
i guess like drastic improvement
23:42
yeah people to take a chance be able to
23:45
push boundaries yeah
23:47
i'm the type of person that if i watch
23:48
something and
23:50
it's supposed to
23:51
the character is supposed to be based on
23:53
someone with a disability i'm googling
23:55
does this person have any kind of
23:57
disability it's so easy to do like you
23:59
just google it straight away and then
24:01
you're like this is disappointing
24:04
that was the first thing yeah it was the
24:06
first thing i did with eternals so yeah
24:08
yeah it detracts if you find out that
24:10
there is no authenticity behind
24:12
characters so
24:14
yeah again we have our ways of finding
24:16
out there is a thing called the internet
24:18
watch out guys literally right
24:20
yeah
24:21
all right well i think it's time to give
24:23
our score out of five on the inclusive
24:26
disability representation scale okay
24:28
chantelle you can go first what did you
24:30
give eternals out of five
24:33
i'm i'm going to give it a 5 out of 5.
24:37
hi
24:38
that's really good
24:39
i think that might be our first five
24:42
oh really i think it is yeah absolutely
24:44
okay okay maybe almost coffee
24:47
it's nice it's refreshing
24:49
[Laughter]
24:51
uh steph what was your score
24:53
look i'm gonna give it a four out of
24:56
five um as i said this character in the
25:00
comic books that it was adapted from was
25:02
not
25:03
uh
25:04
a woman of color was not a woman first
25:06
of all was not a person with a
25:08
disability so i really
25:10
am grateful that they decided to
25:13
use that the opportunity to turn this
25:15
character into someone that i can
25:17
actually i actually want to watch on on
25:19
screen and actually root for so um
25:21
yeah the only thing i wish they had done
25:24
used more of her throughout the film
25:26
because um she was probably my favorite
25:28
character so yeah i'm a 4.5 out of 5 for
25:32
this film individually um because i
25:35
think it was just done so well um and
25:38
obviously the authentic casting thing
25:39
it's something that i
25:41
go on about all of the time
25:43
but it's very very important clearly um
25:46
and
25:47
i am also very excited
25:49
i've been watching hawkeye and we're
25:51
obviously going to review that in the
25:53
next coming weeks because there's also
25:56
disability representation throughout
25:57
that and i'm it's just exciting to me i
26:00
guess
26:01
that marvel are actually like okay this
26:03
is good it's positive it's working
26:05
people are responding really well let's
26:06
do more of it
26:07
um so
26:09
yeah that just makes me
26:11
really happy i guess so that's our score
26:14
so that's pretty much it so thank you so
26:17
much okay chantelle and steph for
26:19
joining me today and thank you everyone
26:21
who followed along at home as always
26:24
make sure you go and follow our social
26:26
media pages because
26:27
that is where we want to hear your
26:29
thoughts your scores your feelings if
26:31
you agreed or disagreed with any of the
26:34
things that we um have shared about our
26:36
analysis of eternals um and if anybody
26:39
wants to shed some more light of their
26:40
own personal experiences of
26:41
neurodiversity or mental health
26:44
and angelina jolie's character i'd love
26:46
to hear a bit more about that or if
26:48
someone has done a bit more research
26:50
than me and has found some other
26:52
people's thoughts on it just whack it in
26:53
the comments send us a dm whatever it is
26:56
um and if email works best for you you
26:59
can also email us at hello
27:00
reframepodcast.com
27:02
um
27:03
yeah because i guess like you know as i
27:05
always say in each episode the whole
27:07
point of what we're doing here is to
27:09
create conversation around change and
27:11
the things that the industries are doing
27:13
well the things that they're not doing
27:14
well um and what we as people with
27:17
disability are asking them to do more of
27:19
i guess which really we've cracked on
27:22
about it enough today but to break it
27:24
down all we're asking for is more
27:25
representation more positive
27:27
representation and just make it genuine
27:29
and also
27:30
give us some control over the narrative
27:32
as well anyway that's enough
27:36
i bid you both farewell and thank you
27:39
everyone and we'll see you next week
27:47
[Music]
27:50
hello
27:54
[Music]
28:00
[Music]
28:06
you
Continue listening
Episode 1 of 'ReFramed - Disability in Media' introduces Jason Clymo (series host) and co-hosts, Steph Dower and Robyn Lambird.
Special
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 1
•36 mins
Audio
The team chat with speaker and comedian Rose Callaghan and dissect TV series The Wrong Girl and the movie Wonder.
Rose Callaghan: 'The Wrong Girl' + 'Wonder'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 2
•33 mins
Audio
Features arts inclusivity champion Genevieve Clay-Smith and reviews of TV's Game of Thrones and movie Me Before You.
Genevieve Clay-Smith: 'Game of Thrones' + 'Me Before You'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 3
•33 mins
Audio
This episode: Ming Luo's experiences of being blind; disability representation in film The Fundamentals of Caring and TV's In the Dark.
Ming Luo: 'The Fundamentals of Caring' + 'In The Dark'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 4
•41 mins
Audio
This episode, Jason McCurry on disability and empowerment, and the team review TV series The Politician and film A Quiet Place.
Jason McCurry: 'The Politician' + 'A Quiet Place'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 5
•34 mins
Audio
Hosts Steph, Jason & Robyn review recent developments and discuss the Netfix show Sex Education and disability.
Jason Clymo - Sex Education
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 6
•26 mins
Audio
This week, transformative justice influencer K Shantel joins the team to discuss Marvel movie Eternals.
K Shantel: 'Eternals'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 7
•28 mins
Audio
This week: James Parr - model, triathlete, writer. We analyse how vintage children's film The Secret Garden shows disability.
James Parr: 'The Secret Garden'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 8
•25 mins
Audio
Movie The Peanut Butter Falcon is analysed through a disability-framing lens with special guest, human rights champion Graeme Innes.
Graeme Innes: 'The Peanut Butter Falcon'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 9
•27 mins
Audio
TV series The Witcher is assessed with special guest Catia Malaquias, human rights lawyer and disability advocate.
Catia Malaquias: 'The Witcher'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 10
•34 mins
Audio
Tobi Green Adenowo, UK activist and presenter, helps unpick disability representation in animated film Luca.
Tobi Green Adenowo: 'Luca'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 11
•39 mins
Audio
The team and personal/professional development specialist Carson Tueller analyse movie A Quiet Place Part 2.
Carson Tueller: 'A Quiet Place 2'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 12
•39 mins
Audio
Marvel's Hawkeye is put under a disability-critical eye by the team and special guest: film and TV specialist Tracey Vieira.
Tracey Vieira: 'Hawkeye'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 13
•39 mins
Audio
ReFramed takes on Enid Blyton - the TV adaptation of her Malory Towers discussed with author and activist Carly Findlay.
Carly Findlay: 'Malory Towers'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 14
•38 mins
Audio
Disability representation on TV's The Sex Lives of College Girls is unpacked - with model and communicator Rhiannon Tracey.
Rhiannon Tracey: 'The Sex Lives of College Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 15
•29 mins
Audio
This week, fashion and screen inclusion advocate Angel Dixon helps examine disability representation in TV series Raising Dion.
Angel Dixon - 'Raising Dion'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 16
•51 mins
Audio
Writer, creator and activist Nina Tame joins the ReFramed team to analyse Disney favourite Finding Nemo.
Nina Tame: 'Finding Nemo'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 17
•39 mins
Audio
Akii Ngo - advocate, model, writer, consultant - brings a range of lived experiences and helps review the film Love and Other Drugs.
Akii Ngo: 'Love and Other Drugs'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 18
•45 mins
Audio
Greens Senator Jordon Steele-John helps the team analyse the film Run from the viewpoint of disability presentation.
Senator Jordon Steele-John: 'Run'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 19
•27 mins
Audio
Model, actor and activist Maya Dove helps the team to analyse hilarious TV show Derry Girls.
Maya Dove: 'Derry Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 20
•27 mins
Audio
Michelle Roger - writer, artist, photographer, model - joins the team to discuss TV show The L Word Gen Q.
Michelle Roger: 'The L Word Gen Q'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 21
•27 mins
Audio
Rebooted TV series Queer as Folk goes under the disability lens with the team - joined by businessman and advocate Luke Christian.
Luke Christian: Queer as Folk (2022)
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 22
•27 mins
Audio
Writer, digital creator and advocate Annie Segarra helps the team review animated TV series Dead End: Paranormal Park.
Annie Segarra: 'Dead End: Paranormal Park'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 23
•27 mins
Audio
TV's Heartbreak High is assessed through a disability lens with Anja Christofferson, advocate and social entrepreneur.
Anja Christoffersen: 'Heartbreak High'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 24
•27 mins
Audio
The team is joined by writer, actor, producer and activist Emily Dash - to review TV series Switched At Birth.
Emily Dash: 'Switched At Birth'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 25
•27 mins
Audio