Audio
Graeme Innes: 'The Peanut Butter Falcon'
ReFramed by
Attitude Foundation3 seasons
Episode 9
27 mins
Movie The Peanut Butter Falcon is analysed through a disability-framing lens with special guest, human rights champion Graeme Innes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ed290/ed2909cffb96ff20af071c012494cef6bfd676dd" alt="Behind the scenes filming in a dark room"
Join us again this week as we discuss The Peanut Butter Falcon, a film about a man with Down syndrome who runs away from a residential nursing home to pursue his dream of becoming a wrestler. On his journey, he meets with an outlaw who becomes his friend and coach.
We are thrilled to let you all know that this week's guest is Graeme Innes - former Disability Discrimination Commissioner, and an absolute legend for disability rights in Australia.
Guess what!? He's also a big fan of the podcast! YAY!
0:00
coming up on reframed this week's
0:03
special guest which is graeme innes
0:06
and today we'll be discussing the peanut
0:08
butter falcon i love the name i love all
0:10
the south american oh you know southern
0:12
american stuff in the movie it's awesome
0:14
the accents and almost for a second was
0:16
like oh no they're gonna fall into a
0:17
chat here and
0:18
i have nothing much but praise for this
0:20
film i thought it was i thought it was
0:22
quite genuinely um generally a nice film
0:31
so welcome back everyone to reframed the
Welcome
0:34
podcast that reframes how disability is
0:36
portrayed in film and tv
0:38
i'm your host jason climo and today i
0:40
have the wonderful stephanie dower with
0:42
me as my co-host
0:44
along with this week's special guest
0:46
which is graeme innes
0:48
and today we'll be discussing the peanut
0:50
butter falcon which is a very
0:52
interesting film
0:54
and i'm very excited to get stuck into
0:56
analyzing that one but before we do
0:59
let's learn a bit more about graham sure
1:01
well i was a commissioner at the human
1:03
rights commission for about 10 years
1:05
and
1:06
after that i
1:08
have become a
1:10
consultant and a company director so i
1:12
now sit on about four or five different
1:13
boards of uh organizations
1:16
for purpose organizations
1:18
um and when i left the commission i
1:21
realized that
1:23
the major barrier that people with
1:24
disabilities experienced in australia
1:27
was the attitude barrier so
1:30
i and a few other people founded
1:32
attitude foundation uh which of course
1:35
having made the perspective shift series
1:38
um is is uh
1:40
making the the uh reframed podcast uh
1:44
with uh you two and and robin and uh
1:47
it's in my podcast app of choice uh one
1:50
of my favorite podcasts
1:52
i think he said you were maybe our
1:54
number one fan
1:55
oh well i'm certainly a fan there's no
1:57
doubt about that
1:59
we love it it's always nice to talk to a
Representation
2:01
fan um
2:06
graeme do you want to just talk a bit
2:08
about
2:09
we were talking just before the two of
2:11
us and
2:12
can you just sort of share your thoughts
2:13
on
2:14
what representation in
2:17
things like film and television actually
2:19
do to combat that attitude barrier that
2:22
you were talking about
2:25
well you cannot be what you cannot see
2:27
and so um if we're not seeing people
2:30
with disabilities uh on screens on our
2:33
on our smart
2:34
screens or on our television screens or
2:37
movie screens uh then we're not getting
2:39
a true picture of the whole population
2:43
and so i think it's critical
2:45
i think it's critical to people with
2:46
disabilities getting jobs uh being able
2:49
to participate
2:50
and interact in the community
2:52
and to full inclusion so
2:54
we have to get better representation on
2:56
screens
2:57
and
2:58
i think
2:59
four percent currently is the screen
3:01
australia um
3:03
numbers and they've done the research on
3:05
it and that just sucks in terms of uh
3:08
in terms of what the real population
3:10
numbers are between around 21
Quotas
3:13
yeah and i guess on that like i i've
3:16
heard you talk a lot about percentages
3:19
and and quotas is something that i
3:20
wanted to ask you about is is quotas
3:22
something that you feel is
3:25
a good way to reform the industry like
3:28
all about creative industries in terms
3:29
of becoming more inclusive and
3:31
representing people with disability
3:33
i'm careful jason not to use the word
3:35
quotas not because there's anything
3:37
wrong with the word but because of the
3:38
pejorative meaning that it's uh that
3:40
it's now um
3:42
um you know received
3:44
so um quotas uh are viewed negatively
3:48
because you know we have to get a
3:49
certain percentage of people whether
3:51
it's women or people with disabilities
3:53
or people from different cultural
3:54
backgrounds
3:55
i use the word targets
3:57
and my target is
3:59
21 because that's where we sit in the
4:01
population uh so um but i'm i'm very
4:05
convinced that if we don't set targets
4:08
we won't
4:10
we won't move the the needle on this at
4:12
all because
4:13
we haven't really
4:15
with a few small exceptions set targets
4:18
for employment of people with
4:19
disabilities and the unemployment gap
4:22
between people with disabilities and the
4:23
general population
4:25
sits at 30 percent we are 30 percent
4:27
less employed than uh the general
4:30
population and that gap has not changed
4:32
in three decades so it's quite clear to
4:35
me that the only thing that works is
4:37
targets
4:38
yeah
4:39
absolutely
Targets
4:41
i think that's so important i think it's
4:43
it's about languages and it's about
4:45
here we go reframing how we
4:48
think about that you know a quota sounds
4:51
like something that
4:52
we have to do we're forced to do whereas
4:54
a target is something we can aspire to
4:56
something we can we can reach for
5:00
well um yeah and not just aspire to but
5:02
want to do and um
5:04
and so
5:06
we in business everywhere else we set
5:08
targets you know it is um there's
5:10
ethical reasons it's just the right
5:12
thing to do to include all um members of
5:15
the community and um it's the right
5:18
thing for a range of reasons firstly
5:20
because the a fully inclusive community
5:22
will be a stronger community because
5:24
everyone's participating everyone's
5:26
putting in there are there are no
5:27
barriers
5:28
and
5:29
what it will do
5:30
is move
5:32
people with disabilities and others off
5:34
welfare and into paying tax so we'll
5:37
actually build the economy and you know
5:39
when you go to a function whether it's a
5:41
barbecue or a christmas party
5:44
or a cocktail function the first
5:46
question people ask you is what do you
5:48
do
5:49
so we rate people buy their jobs and the
5:52
fact that they have jobs so if we've got
5:54
a 30 uh jobs gap as i've described
5:57
then there's significant social
5:59
disadvantage for people with
6:01
disabilities as well as economic
6:02
disadvantage so
6:04
inclusion means everyone wins
6:06
yeah absolutely
6:08
so i love that
6:10
was there anything else you wanted to uh
6:12
school us on before we move on i feel
6:14
like you're just such a beacon of
6:15
knowledge that i'm like
6:16
we need to just share as much as we
6:18
possibly can oh you're very generous
6:20
jason
6:22
look i i
6:24
i certainly want to raise some issues as
6:26
we talk about the uh the movie uh no
6:28
doubt we'll talk more about
6:31
inclusion and and stuff like that i also
6:33
want to raise the question of audio
6:35
description um because you know um it's
6:38
the reason i don't watch that many
6:40
movies um because
6:43
most movies or many movies are not audio
6:45
described
6:46
and as we as we get to talk about uh
6:49
peanut butter falcon
6:51
what i plan to do because i i couldn't
6:53
watch it with audio description i
6:54
couldn't find audio description for the
6:56
movie um and what i would normally do is
6:59
then watch it with someone else and get
7:01
them to fill in the gaps i chose not to
7:03
do that this time and i want to share
7:05
those gaps with you
Synopsis
7:10
so the peanut butter falcon
7:12
came out in 2019 in cinemas here in
7:15
australia and it is an adventure drama
7:18
that tells the story of
7:20
zack who is a young man living with down
7:23
syndrome or trisomy 21.
7:26
um he's living in a residential nursing
7:29
home over in america and he has an
7:33
obsession a dream to become a
7:36
professional wrestler and has an idol
7:39
and he sets out on this basically he
7:42
escapes from this nursing home and sets
7:44
out on this
7:46
nomads adventure uh who he teams up with
7:49
uh shia labeouf um
7:51
and uh the two of them embark on this
7:54
adventure to find this idol wrestler
7:57
that zach has and um
7:59
it's
8:00
what the classic bunny film in my
8:03
opinion it's two guys out in the lamb
8:06
you know they're just making their way
8:09
to their destination any way they can
8:11
and it's it's a fun adventure it's uh
8:14
it's a very interesting adventure i will
8:16
say that
8:19
there's definitely a lot of interesting
8:20
moments throughout
Initial Thoughts
8:23
so graham what were your initial
8:24
thoughts i guess on the portrayal of
8:27
disability
8:28
well i really liked the film i thought
8:30
that the film showed genuine friendship
8:33
um not token friendship um where both
8:36
both friends had something to
8:38
uh to bring uh to the relationship you
8:41
know um
8:42
uh
8:43
zach brought um
8:45
uh zach brought his his strength his
8:47
contribution uh he's his focus
8:50
uh and um
8:52
and his buddy um uh brought skills as
8:55
well uh and as opposed to the the
8:58
genuine the general portrayal portrayal
9:00
of people with disabilities as sort of
9:02
helper or helpee
9:04
um i love the desire for
9:05
self-determination um that lives in most
9:08
of us with with disabilities although
9:10
it's often uh held back by the community
9:14
i really enjoyed the right to take risks
9:17
and
9:18
enjoy life
9:19
and the character was really um
9:21
charismatic so i really loved it
Content Warning
9:25
yeah yeah me too
9:27
i was a big fan i am i think one thing i
9:29
would say is like a bit of a content
9:31
warning for anyone who hasn't already
9:32
watched it is the r word is used
9:34
a fair bit throughout um and it was an
9:37
interesting one though because
9:40
often i really don't enjoy films where
9:42
that word is used but the way that it
9:44
was used in the way that it was kind of
9:46
unpacked and um i guess used as a tool
9:49
to demonstrate like the everyday ableism
9:52
that people disability
9:53
do face in the real world
9:55
was quite interesting and um i guess
9:58
meaningful
9:59
whereas it wasn't you know it was
10:00
explained quite well whereas i feel like
10:02
i've watched films before where the r
10:04
word was used was like i don't think
10:06
this was explained well enough that this
10:08
is not an acceptable word to be using um
10:10
like i feel like you know young children
10:12
watching that film would would watch
10:14
that and see the word used and be like
10:16
oh this is not a good thing to be doing
10:18
there was a really powerful scene
10:20
towards the end of the movie between
10:22
shyla and um
10:24
eleanor who was the um
10:26
well i think became the love interest in
10:28
the end
10:29
and um uh but but she was uh zack's
10:33
social worker at the start uh and um i
10:36
thought there was a very powerful scene
10:37
where
10:38
her desire to care
10:41
was challenged by his desire um shyla's
10:44
desire to um
10:46
uh to support zach in his quest for
10:49
freedom and achievement and uh they both
10:51
spoke very strongly in that scene and i
10:53
thought it very powerfully um addressed
10:56
that r word question that you're talking
10:58
about jason definitely yeah
11:01
steph what were your thoughts
11:02
yeah i'm agreeing with everything you
11:04
guys are saying i really i really
11:07
enjoyed this film
11:08
it was
11:09
it was really refreshing to see
11:12
a young man living with disability in
11:14
this case down syndrome or trust me 21
11:17
and he had like the story was his
11:20
it wasn't
11:21
sort of about the world around him it
11:23
was his story his journey and he really
11:26
had i read a few articles leading up to
11:28
our chat today and they talked about how
11:30
he had agency in the film and
11:33
he was the one that kicked off his
11:35
journey it wasn't like something
11:37
happened to him no he made it happen and
11:40
and that stayed with him throughout the
11:42
entire
11:43
journey um with with this guy that he
11:46
meets and befriends and
11:48
i i love what you said graham about how
11:51
you know i think something about a body
11:52
film
11:53
it's it's two guys or two people
11:56
learning from each other on a journey
11:58
and that's exactly what you said graham
12:00
they it wasn't like shia was just there
12:03
to guide zach on this journey it wasn't
12:05
like you know it was it was a team they
12:08
were a team together and they each had
12:10
their strengths they each had their
12:11
downfalls um so i i thought it was a
12:14
really
12:15
fresh perspective on a disability
12:18
narrative i haven't seen really anything
12:21
much like it even since then
12:24
yeah i
12:25
i have nothing much but praise for this
12:27
film i thought it was i thought it was
12:29
quite genuinely um generally a nice film
How the film came about
12:32
yeah that's awesome and obviously the
12:34
genuine casting is a massive win for us
12:38
even
12:39
did you see um
12:40
so how the film came about i again i
12:43
read this um in an article was um zack
12:47
wanted he's been acting all his life and
12:50
he wanted to be in a feature film and he
12:52
came to i don't know if they were
12:54
friends before this or he met them
12:56
somewhere but he came to the writer
12:58
directors of the film and was like i
13:01
want to be in a feature film
13:02
do you want to you know you want to
13:04
write something for me or you want to
13:05
come on this journey with me and the
13:07
three of them teamed up and this is the
13:10
result so
13:11
again even in real life zach himself
13:14
really had that agency he made he made
13:16
his journey happen so i thought that was
13:19
really cool and that authenticity that
13:21
that genuineness really came through in
13:23
the film
13:24
yeah
The blind man
13:26
love that and there was also like other
13:28
representations of people with
13:30
disabilities so there was the blind man
13:32
who actually shot at them
13:34
i've forgotten his name yeah but he
13:37
cracked me up massively like yeah it was
13:39
hilarious and i um almost for a second
13:42
was like oh no they're gonna fall into a
13:44
trap here and turn this person into i
13:46
don't even know what they were going to
13:47
do with that like i thought they were
13:49
going to play some trick on him and he
13:50
was going to be blind and he wasn't
13:51
going to see them and they were going to
13:53
get away with his boat or something but
13:55
that also turned into like a really
13:56
great moment like he was a very valuable
13:59
person in their journey and and taught
14:02
them a lot as well so
14:03
um i just loved all the interaction i
14:06
think between you know non-disabled
14:08
people and people with disability
14:09
throughout so yeah it was also it was
14:12
also good to see
14:13
i think you mentioned you touched on
14:15
this before jason
14:16
the risk that that each of them took in
14:18
the film like it wasn't a safe sort of
14:21
thing like there is
14:23
one shot comes back to me where
14:26
zack's shooting a gun and the back like
14:29
the backfire sort of like launches in
14:31
backwards
14:32
and i'm like
14:34
you don't you know usually people with
14:36
disabilities again are portrayed like as
14:38
like these helpless individuals and
14:40
you know oh they could never do
14:42
something they couldn't be capable of
14:44
something like that but you see zach
14:45
just launched back and it was it was
14:47
funny you were allowed to laugh at that
14:49
and it
14:50
it humanizes um people disability and
14:54
people like zack so the scene that i
The difference between caring and supporting
14:56
talked about really emphasizes that
14:58
point i just wanted to um yeah agree
15:00
with you because um
15:02
because the scene where shyla and
15:05
eleanor have the argument um
15:08
is all about the difference between her
15:10
caring uh and shyla supporting zack's
15:15
dignity of risk and and uh and freedom
15:18
to pursue his um his goal
15:21
so so i think um what it does what that
15:24
scene does is just um demonstrates that
15:27
difference um as i said between um
15:30
eleanor wanting to care for zach and
15:33
protect zack
15:35
and shyler supporting zach in his
15:38
his quest for um you know freedom and to
15:41
achieve his his goal and um even when he
15:45
meets with his hero
15:47
or his the the wrestling school uh hero
15:50
saltwater redneck
15:51
i love the name i love all the south
15:53
american oh you know southern american
15:55
stuff in the movie it's awesome the
15:56
accents and um
15:59
uh the whole scenes but um
16:01
even when he meets him he's initially
16:04
not sort of supportive of um training
16:07
act but he reassesses his um position
16:10
and it's so that's just another person
16:13
in the movie um reassessing their view
16:15
or their understanding of a person uh
16:18
with a disability and it's awesome to
16:20
see those change journeys i think um
16:22
that really makes uh the movie even more
16:25
valuable for me
Accessibility
16:27
yeah and then like i guess non-disabled
16:29
audience members in in terms of like
16:30
watching the film i i would hope that
16:32
they sort of go on that similar change
16:34
journey as well which is yeah the
16:36
exciting part and the power i guess
16:38
of media and the whole point why we do
16:41
this so absolutely absolutely i know you
16:43
spoke earlier about um some things you
16:46
didn't love about it and in terms of the
16:48
accessibility of accessing
16:51
i guess a fully accessible version of
16:53
the film did you want to touch on that
16:55
sure well um what i didn't love about it
16:58
and i i won't take points off the um the
17:02
movie for this because uh oh maybe i
17:04
will when we get to our scoring um
17:06
but what i love what i didn't love about
17:08
it was that i couldn't find an audio
17:11
description um of the movie and so i
17:14
watched the movie um without audio
17:16
description
17:18
normally i would try to um
17:21
normally i would try and watch a movie
17:23
like that with someone else who could
17:25
fill in the blanks
17:26
in the movie and so i do have some
17:28
blanks in the in the movie and i wanted
17:30
to
17:31
share that with you because from my
17:32
perspective as a as a person who can't
17:34
see the screen it just shows the
17:36
criticality of audio description
17:39
um so there's one part in the movie and
17:41
i've
17:43
discovered this later
17:44
where shyla
17:47
wants to steal a boat from these two
17:49
shrimp um shrimp fishes fishermen who
17:53
are sort of portrayed as the bad guys
17:55
they're probably not really bad guys
17:56
because um
17:58
you know he
17:59
he causes some damage to their their
18:01
business
18:02
and he um and a fire occurs and there's
18:05
about twelve thousand dollars worth of
18:07
damage to the business now i don't know
18:10
whether he
18:11
actively lit that fire as a diversion
18:14
or whether he
18:16
whether it was incidental or unfortunate
18:20
and i still don't know that and the the
18:22
most sad part for me is that
18:25
after
18:26
zack goes to saltwater rednecks training
18:29
school
18:30
all three of them
18:32
eleanor zack and shyla
18:35
head on to florida where shyla was
18:37
planning to go anyway
18:39
and
18:41
all you get is the conversation about
18:43
them arriving in florida
18:45
and then there's a country in western
18:47
song that plays
18:48
about um a house that's like that's set
18:51
up so it becomes a home
18:53
i don't know whether zac and
18:55
sorry whether shyla and eleanor
18:59
formed a relationship
19:00
i think they may have from some of the
19:02
clues in the movie but i don't know that
19:04
for sure and i don't know where zach
19:06
lived in florida did he share the house
19:08
with them
19:09
that's the ending that you would expect
19:11
you know the nice the happy ending to
19:13
the adventure but nothing in the movie
19:15
told me that so um i just wanted to
19:18
share that with both of you and the
19:20
audience because that's a real
19:21
demonstration of the criticality of um
19:25
of the audio description of a lot of the
19:27
visuals that occurred um without any um
19:30
voice interaction to to give me the
19:32
clues as to what was happening
What happened at the end
19:37
yeah and like such a miss opportunity
19:39
there like you've they've created this
19:41
amazing portrayal of disability but then
19:44
you know the fact the industry isn't
19:46
accessible enough to actually give you
19:48
the full i guess the full experience is
19:50
really the way you would say it like you
19:52
don't have that full experience of that
19:54
film now because it's not giving you
19:58
i guess the whole the whole picture
20:00
really correct
20:01
and so you guys have got to help me out
20:03
what happened at the end yeah so i was
20:04
gonna say for your sake uh i believe it
20:08
ends with them like driving off into the
20:10
distance and um shyla buff's character
20:12
sort of puts his hand
20:14
on eleanor's shoulder and then she puts
20:17
her hand on his so i guess
20:19
i think it doesn't actually show
20:21
really we don't know but i think the um
20:24
insinuation would be that they do go on
20:26
and be a family so and that there is a
20:28
romantic
20:30
romantic uh interest between shia
20:32
labeouf's character and eleanor i'm a
20:35
romantic so i'm i'm i'm prepared to if
20:37
it's not clear i'll i'll take that jason
20:39
thank you
20:41
we can all just use our imagination and
20:42
be yeah happily ever after i think i
20:45
think is the intention yeah
20:47
i think that's a really good um sort of
20:50
reflection on
20:52
you know the disability community is
20:55
we're so
20:56
diverse in nature that
20:59
just because you know these filmmakers
21:02
and you know zach himself you know have
21:04
experience with one form of disability
21:06
means that you know it doesn't
21:08
necessarily mean that they are across
21:10
all kinds of accessibility so you know
21:12
it's such a great portrayal but because
21:14
they weren't across or they didn't go
21:16
down the route of um audio description
21:19
then part of the disability community
21:21
you know ironically cannot actually
21:24
fully access this film so i think that's
21:27
something that is very um
21:29
something you know that a lot of people
21:31
don't realize with the disability
21:32
community is we don't know i don't know
21:35
the experience of someone who is vision
21:37
impaired just like someone who's vision
21:38
impaired does not necessarily know the
21:41
experience of someone who is a
21:43
wheelchair user so i think that's really
21:45
important um to sort of get more out
21:48
there instead of
21:49
lumping everyone together you know sure
21:51
there are some shared experiences but
21:54
more often than not we are all very
21:57
different
21:58
individual people
The Inclusive Disability Rating
22:04
now i think it might be time to give our
22:07
scores out of five on the inclusive
22:09
disability representation scale graham
22:12
did you want to kick us off what did you
22:13
give peanut butter falcon out of five
22:16
i love the idr you know i'm really um
22:20
even more a fan of that than the podcast
22:22
if i if that's possible um
22:24
but
22:25
i um
22:26
uh i i rated it highly because i loved
22:29
the movie um and i i rated it hardly
22:32
because i uh the actor was a person with
22:34
a disability so um you don't have to
22:36
mark it down for that jason as you often
22:38
do
22:40
i took off half a point because
22:42
you know the studio or
22:44
um or the the company making it
22:46
available i got it through um apple but
22:49
you know it's probably available in in
22:51
different forms i didn't provide audio
22:53
description so i gave it four and a half
22:54
out of five
22:56
wow yeah lovely stuff yeah i i thought
23:00
this week was going to be a high week i
23:02
mean which is good compared to last week
23:04
we needed a bit of a boost
23:07
um but i so i've based all of my idr
23:11
scores
23:12
off the the content within the story and
23:14
the the
23:16
authenticity in casting and all that
23:18
kind of thing so i'm actually gonna give
23:19
it a five out of five
23:21
um which is i think my possibly my first
23:24
five so
23:26
big moment i think it is
23:28
i feel like you're normally like the
23:30
harshest of us all is that true or maybe
23:32
it's me i can be i feel like we take
23:34
turns we can play good cover yeah
23:36
sometimes yeah true
Final Thoughts
23:38
well i'll i'll be honest whereas i i
23:41
think thank you graeme for educating me
23:43
on the lack of access in terms of
23:46
you know
23:47
on on the other end i guess of when
23:49
you're actually trying to watch the film
23:51
that it's not
23:52
fully accessible at this point in time
23:54
um i would say that i would take off
23:57
half a point for that but otherwise i
23:59
was
23:59
coming into this conversation
24:02
fully intended and giving it a five out
24:04
of five because i just absolutely love
24:06
the way the disability is portrayed it
24:09
feels like i feel like when i watch it
24:11
i can feel that
24:13
people with disability had so much
24:14
agency in actually
24:16
controlling the narrative like it feels
24:18
so genuine and fun and
24:21
not like we are these people that are
24:23
just going to break any opportunity that
24:26
we have out in the real world um so i
24:28
think they did such a great job of
24:31
showing those change journeys i love
24:33
that language i've never heard that
24:34
before i'm going to use that all the
24:36
time now so thank you she probably tried
24:38
to coin that term already graham but now
24:40
it's mine
24:42
i just made it up on the run actually
24:44
jason so that's great i'm using it thank
24:47
you yeah go for it it's yours i love
24:49
like they unpacked so many different
24:51
stereotypes i feel throughout as well
24:53
which is just
24:55
what we need um
24:57
yeah and it was just
24:58
all in all as well it was actually just
24:59
like a really fun
25:01
and interesting to watch it was really
25:03
engaging it was really enjoyable and you
25:05
know zach's charisma just leaps off the
25:08
screen but he was surrounded by also
25:10
like really interesting eccentric
25:13
characters like it wasn't all about zac
25:15
either so um yeah no yeah it's a really
25:18
fun time people should go watch it
25:21
and yeah absolutely
25:23
an important thing to bring up though is
25:24
that like
25:25
stories that are just like so like
25:28
focused on the disability or the
25:30
experience of disability can often come
25:32
across as really tokenistic and that's
25:34
not what's happened here either so
25:37
yes if you haven't watched it you
25:39
definitely need to go and watch it um
25:41
and i think on that note we should uh
25:43
wrap up this week's episode on a very
25:46
happy and high note which is great um
25:48
but let us know what you thought of the
25:50
peanut butter falcon um let us know if
25:52
you've got any questions for graeme as
25:54
well like i said huge amount of
25:56
knowledge and experience here that i
25:58
feel like we need to be tapping into a
25:59
lot more which is great um and yeah you
26:02
can find us on all of our social media
26:05
pages if you basically just search
26:07
reframed podcast you'll find us on
26:09
twitter facebook and instagram we'd love
26:11
to hear your idr scores for the peanut
26:14
butter falcon and any thoughts you had
26:17
or any kind of little bits of analyses
26:19
that you might have thought of when you
26:21
were watching along it's the whole point
26:23
we're trying to turn you all into our
26:24
little reframers as well
26:27
um and help keep this conversation about
26:29
inclusive representation in uh
26:31
mainstream media alive um
26:34
not just a live really actually get it
26:36
get the flame caught on so that industry
26:39
starts taking a bit more notice of
26:41
people's disability the way that we want
26:43
to be represented
26:45
and helps create that change alongside
26:47
us um
26:49
lastly i really just want to say a huge
26:50
thank you as well to the community
26:52
broadcasting foundation who are helping
26:54
to fund this series
26:56
obviously such an important conversation
26:58
to be had so we're very grateful to them
27:01
other than that i think that's it and
27:03
thank you everyone as well at home for
27:05
following along and we'll see you next
27:07
time
27:09
bye
27:14
[Music]
27:25
[Music]
27:38
[Applause]
27:40
you
Continue listening
Episode 1 of 'ReFramed - Disability in Media' introduces Jason Clymo (series host) and co-hosts, Steph Dower and Robyn Lambird.
Special
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 1
•36 mins
Audio
The team chat with speaker and comedian Rose Callaghan and dissect TV series The Wrong Girl and the movie Wonder.
Rose Callaghan: 'The Wrong Girl' + 'Wonder'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 2
•33 mins
Audio
Features arts inclusivity champion Genevieve Clay-Smith and reviews of TV's Game of Thrones and movie Me Before You.
Genevieve Clay-Smith: 'Game of Thrones' + 'Me Before You'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 3
•33 mins
Audio
This episode: Ming Luo's experiences of being blind; disability representation in film The Fundamentals of Caring and TV's In the Dark.
Ming Luo: 'The Fundamentals of Caring' + 'In The Dark'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 4
•41 mins
Audio
This episode, Jason McCurry on disability and empowerment, and the team review TV series The Politician and film A Quiet Place.
Jason McCurry: 'The Politician' + 'A Quiet Place'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 5
•34 mins
Audio
Hosts Steph, Jason & Robyn review recent developments and discuss the Netfix show Sex Education and disability.
Jason Clymo - Sex Education
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 6
•26 mins
Audio
This week, transformative justice influencer K Shantel joins the team to discuss Marvel movie Eternals.
K Shantel: 'Eternals'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 7
•28 mins
Audio
This week: James Parr - model, triathlete, writer. We analyse how vintage children's film The Secret Garden shows disability.
James Parr: 'The Secret Garden'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 8
•25 mins
Audio
Movie The Peanut Butter Falcon is analysed through a disability-framing lens with special guest, human rights champion Graeme Innes.
Graeme Innes: 'The Peanut Butter Falcon'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 9
•27 mins
Audio
TV series The Witcher is assessed with special guest Catia Malaquias, human rights lawyer and disability advocate.
Catia Malaquias: 'The Witcher'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 10
•34 mins
Audio
Tobi Green Adenowo, UK activist and presenter, helps unpick disability representation in animated film Luca.
Tobi Green Adenowo: 'Luca'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 11
•39 mins
Audio
The team and personal/professional development specialist Carson Tueller analyse movie A Quiet Place Part 2.
Carson Tueller: 'A Quiet Place 2'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 12
•39 mins
Audio
Marvel's Hawkeye is put under a disability-critical eye by the team and special guest: film and TV specialist Tracey Vieira.
Tracey Vieira: 'Hawkeye'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 13
•39 mins
Audio
ReFramed takes on Enid Blyton - the TV adaptation of her Malory Towers discussed with author and activist Carly Findlay.
Carly Findlay: 'Malory Towers'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 14
•38 mins
Audio
Disability representation on TV's The Sex Lives of College Girls is unpacked - with model and communicator Rhiannon Tracey.
Rhiannon Tracey: 'The Sex Lives of College Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 15
•29 mins
Audio
This week, fashion and screen inclusion advocate Angel Dixon helps examine disability representation in TV series Raising Dion.
Angel Dixon - 'Raising Dion'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 16
•51 mins
Audio
Writer, creator and activist Nina Tame joins the ReFramed team to analyse Disney favourite Finding Nemo.
Nina Tame: 'Finding Nemo'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 17
•39 mins
Audio
Akii Ngo - advocate, model, writer, consultant - brings a range of lived experiences and helps review the film Love and Other Drugs.
Akii Ngo: 'Love and Other Drugs'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 18
•45 mins
Audio
Greens Senator Jordon Steele-John helps the team analyse the film Run from the viewpoint of disability presentation.
Senator Jordon Steele-John: 'Run'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 19
•27 mins
Audio
Model, actor and activist Maya Dove helps the team to analyse hilarious TV show Derry Girls.
Maya Dove: 'Derry Girls'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 20
•27 mins
Audio
Michelle Roger - writer, artist, photographer, model - joins the team to discuss TV show The L Word Gen Q.
Michelle Roger: 'The L Word Gen Q'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 21
•27 mins
Audio
Rebooted TV series Queer as Folk goes under the disability lens with the team - joined by businessman and advocate Luke Christian.
Luke Christian: Queer as Folk (2022)
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 22
•27 mins
Audio
Writer, digital creator and advocate Annie Segarra helps the team review animated TV series Dead End: Paranormal Park.
Annie Segarra: 'Dead End: Paranormal Park'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 23
•27 mins
Audio
TV's Heartbreak High is assessed through a disability lens with Anja Christofferson, advocate and social entrepreneur.
Anja Christoffersen: 'Heartbreak High'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 24
•27 mins
Audio
The team is joined by writer, actor, producer and activist Emily Dash - to review TV series Switched At Birth.
Emily Dash: 'Switched At Birth'
ReFramed by Attitude Foundation
Episode 25
•27 mins
Audio